Skip to content

OAK-11506 Update oak-segment-azure tools to use azure sdk v12 implementation#2160

Merged
smiroslav merged 11 commits intoapache:trunkfrom
ierandra:issue/OAK-11506
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

OAK-11506 Update oak-segment-azure tools to use azure sdk v12 implementation#2160
smiroslav merged 11 commits intoapache:trunkfrom
ierandra:issue/OAK-11506

Conversation

@ierandra
Copy link
Contributor

@ierandra ierandra commented Mar 10, 2025

OAK-11506 Update oak-segment-azure tools to use azure sdk v12 implementation

@ierandra ierandra changed the title OAK-11506 Update oak-segment-azure tools to use azure sdk v12 impleme… OAK-11506 Update oak-segment-azure tools to use azure sdk v12 implementation Mar 10, 2025
* the directory to an existing segment store.
* @return the builder
*/
public Builder withRootPrefix(String rootPrefix) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is used in other projects when running compaction

BlobContainerClient targetContainer;
if (sourceBlobContainerClient != null && destinationBlobContainerClient != null) {
roPersistence = new AzurePersistence(sourceBlobContainerClient, rootPrefix);
rwPersistence = new AzurePersistence(destinationBlobContainerClient, rootPrefix);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

targetRootPrefix should be used

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks. fixed

…/OAK-11506

# Conflicts:
#	oak-upgrade/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/upgrade/cli/node/SegmentAzureFactoryTest.java
@smiroslav smiroslav merged commit 117fc05 into apache:trunk Mar 19, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants